What Does The Supreme Court Say About Police Killing Unarmed Civilians?

April V. Taylor

The fact that the overwhelming majority of police officers who kill unarmed, surrendered civilians are never convicted of any crime makes one wonder what the law says about whether or not this act is legal or not.  The recent killing of unarmed teenager Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri has caused many across the country to focus on the issue of police killing and has revealed that incomplete data shows that a person of color is killed by the cops every 28 hours.  Many wonder what legal recourse American citizens have when police become judge, jury and executioner.  There is one Supreme Court case, highlighted by Shaun King, that specifically address the issue of police killing unarmed civilians.

The first case was argued and decided in 1985 and is the case of Tennessee v. Garner.  The background from the case involves an event that occurred in 1974 when Black eighth-grader Edward Eugene Garner stole a purse containing $10.  Officer Elton Hymon caught up to Garner when he reached a chain link fence and ordered him to stop.  Despite observing that Garner was unarmed, Hymon shot Garner in the back of the head as he attempted to climb the fence.  At the time of the incident, Tennessee, as well as 21 other states, had laws that ruled that officers were legally allowed to shoot a suspect who was fleeing in order to “effect an arrest.”  Edward Garner’s father, Cleamtee Garner sued the city of Memphis on the basis that his son’s rights were violated and that the use of deadly force by the officer was extreme and excessive.

As the case made its way through the court system, the 6th Circuit federal appeals court ruled in Garner’s favor stating that the law allowing police to use deadly force on a fleeing suspect should be struck down due to the fact that it violates the protection under the 4th Amendment against unreasonable seizures.  The case wound up before the Supreme Court because the city of Memphis appealed this ruling.  The Supreme Court upheld the 6th Circuit court’s ruling, stating, “The Court explained that shooting a fleeing felon dead is constitutionally unreasonable because “The intrusiveness of a seizure by means of deadly force is unmatched. The suspect’s fundamental interest in his own life need not be elaborated upon. The use of deadly force also frustrates the interest of the individual, and of society, in judicial determination of guilt and punishment. Against these interests are ranged governmental interests in effective law enforcement …. we are not convinced that the use of deadly force is a sufficiently productive means of accomplishing them to justify the killing of nonviolent suspects.”

The cases ruling has very specific implications on the case against Officer Darren Wilson, who shot Michael Brown six times resulting in his death.  According to the official narrative of events regarding Wilson stopping Brown and his friend Dorian Johnson, Wilson stopped the pair because they were jaywalking.  Despite police releasing evidence that Brown may have possibly been involved in a robbery, Wilson was unaware of this information when he stopped them.  Six eyewitnesses state that Brown both verbally and physically surrendered to Wilson prior to the two fatal shots to his head being fired.  Both of these circumstances specifically violate the Supreme Court’s ruling in Tennessee v. Garner.

It must be noted that Missouri Revised Statute 563.046.1, which specifically governs circumstances under which Missouri police officers can use force, has not been updated to reflect the Supreme Court ruling in Tennessee v. Garner, and prosecuting attorney Bob McCulloch has used this outdated statute to prevent police officers from being criminally charged for the deaths of unarmed civilians while in office.  While no one can be sure what will come of Darren Wilson being charged in the death of Michael Brown, what is clear is that the Supreme Court does not give officers a license to kill unarmed civilians at will, simply to keep them from avoiding arrest.



19 Comment

  1. It is nearly impossible to find knowledgeable males and ladies with this topic, and you sound like there

  2. I believe 1 of your advertisings triggered my internet browser to resize, you could effectively want to put that on your blacklist.

  3. I like your writing style genuinely loving this internet web site .

  4. EfI9tg That is a really good tip especially to those new to the blogosphere. Short but very precise information Many thanks for sharing this one. A must read post!

  5. Major thanks for the blog article.Really thank you! Cool.

  6. Wonderful read! I ave saved your site and I am including your RSS feeds

  7. You need to take part in a contest for one of the highest quality
    sites on the net. I am going to recommend this site!

  8. First off I want to say awesome blog! I had a quick question that
    I’d like to ask if you do not mind. I was interested
    to know how you center yourself and clear your head prior to writing.

    I’ve had a hard time clearing my thoughts in getting my thoughts out there.
    I do take pleasure in writing but it just seems like the first
    10 to 15 minutes are usually wasted just trying to figure out how to begin. Any recommendations or hints?
    Many thanks!

  9. It is really a great and helpful piece of information. I’m satisfied that you shared this useful info with us.
    Please stay us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  10. It is best to participate in a contest for among the finest blogs on the web. I all recommend this web site!

  11. This paragraph is actually a pleasant one it helps new
    internet people, who are wishing for blogging.

  12. It’s nearly impossible to find educated people on this subject, but you seem
    like you know what you’re talking about! Thanks

  13. Regards for helping out, superb information.

  14. You are not right. Let as discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.

  15. It as hard to come by experienced people about this subject, however, you seem like you know what you are talking about! Thanks

  16. Excellent beat ! I would like to apprentice while you amend your site, how
    could i subscribe for a blog web site? The
    account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear idea

  17. You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but
    I find this topic to be actually something which I think I would never understand.
    It seems too complex and very broad for me. I’m
    looking forward for your next post, I will try
    to get the hang of it!

  18. zeshQH Thanks-a-mundo for the article.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  19. Thank you ever so for you article post.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

Leave a Comment

Email (will not be published)