Federal Judge Rules Against NYPD Stop & Frisk Practices

Post By RelatedRelated Post

A federal judge ruled yesterday that the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk practices “systemically” violated the constitutional rights of Bronx residents — but said it could continue with proper modifications.

Judge Shira Scheindlin ordered the NYPD to “immediately cease” stopping people outside Bronx apartments enrolled in a voluntary anti-crime program unless cops have “reasonable suspicion of trespass,” in a massive 157-page decision.

The ruling followed testimony last year by four black and Latino Bronx residents who said they were wrongly stopped by cops outside their own homes under the 21-year-old Trespass Affidavit Program, — also known as “Clean Halls” — which allows police to patrol private buildings with a landlord’s consent.

Scheindlin said she is “not ordering the abolition or even a reduction of [TAP], which appears to be a valuable way of using the NYPD’s resources to enhance [security],” she wrote.

Instead, cops will be expected to justify stop-and-frisk encounters beyond saying an individual was suspicious or “furtive.”

The NYPD already changed many of its stop-and-frisk policies last year, after the suit was filed.




6 Comment

  1. I think this is among the such a lot significant information for me. And i’m happy studying your article. However should statement on some basic issues, The web site taste is ideal, the articles is in reality great :D. Excellent job, cheers.

  2. Hi, i think that i noticed you visited my site so i came to “return the choose”.I’m attempting to in finding things to enhance my web site!I suppose its adequate to make use of a few of your concepts!!

  3. I have been reading out many of your articles and i can state pretty clever stuff. I will surely bookmark your site.

  4. Keep working ,terrific job!

  5. This is one awesome blog.Thanks Again.

  6. Very neat blog article.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

Leave a Comment

Email (will not be published)