Logo

NCAA Schools Object To Multi-year Scholarships, But Pay Coaches More

Post By RelatedRelated Post

For the second time in less than two weeks, schools are objecting to a reform measure sought by university presidents and endorsed by NCAA president Mark Emmert.

More than 75 schools are asking to override a plan approved in October to allow multi-year athletic scholarships rather than the one-year renewable awards schools currently provide. That’s the minimum number of dissenters needed for reconsideration by the Division I Board of Directors when it meets next month in Indianapolis at the annual NCAA convention. The NCAA announced the change the Friday before Christmas.

On Dec. 15, the NCAA suspended plans to give athletes a $2,000 stipend for living costs not covered by scholarships after at least 125 schools objected. The higher number of protests allows the organization to immediately put the change on hold.

Both measures were pushed by Emmert and adopted as emergency legislation after a presidential summit in August.

“The NCAA and presidents step up with this legislation and then the universities want to vote it down,” said Christian Dennie, a former compliance officer at Missouri and Oklahoma who now practices sports law in Fort Worth, Texas, and writes an NCAA oversight blog.

“They say, `We don’t have enough money,’ and then the coach gets a $2 million raise,” Dennie added, speaking in general terms rather than about a specific school. “It’s really a resource allocation issue.”

The Division I Board of Directors now faces three options: scrap the two reform measures and operate under previous NCAA rules; modify the rule or create a new proposal that would go back to the schools for another 60-day comment period; or allow members to vote on the override, which needs a 5/8ths majority of the roughly 350 Division I members to pass.

Read More via NCAA Schools Object To Multi-year Scholarships, But Pay Coaches More | News One.

James

5 Comment

  1. Resource allocation. The status quo never wants to change the allocation stream. When I first heard of a basketball coach getting a shoe deal for ‘allowing’ the players wear a certain brand that should have been the signal that the word ‘student’ had been removed from the category student-athlete. It was as if the coach owned the bodies of athletes and they broker these bodies for a price and keep the proceeds.

    The American Council on Education should re-order college life. There should be a demand that the athletic administrations be dissolved and return to status as extra-curricular activities. President Emmert is the latest to do the dance-all sound and fury. The reality is that college athletics should be de-emphasized just as Ivy League schools did following the point shaving scandals of the 1950s.

  2. The next time I learn a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this 1. I mean, I do know it was my choice to read, even so I actually thought youd have something attention-grabbing to say. All I hear is actually a bunch of whining about something that you could fix for those that werent too busy in search of attention.

  3. – yo , Thank you a whole lot for creating this web site . I m into gambling niche and have located this web site employing search on google . Is going to be certain to share . I’m affiliate and have identified your site quite informational Many thanks , see ya. :S

  4. Hi there! This really is kind of off topic but I need to have some advice from an established weblog. Is it very hard to set up your personal blog? I

  5. Respect to post author, some wonderful info .

Leave a Comment

Email (will not be published)